Alt.gothic Alcohol Transfer Engine: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
m (→Process) |
||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
{| | {| | ||
| A wishes to buy B a drink. || A -intent-> B | | A wishes to buy B a drink. || A --intent--> B | ||
|- | |- | ||
| A is able to buy C a drink. || A -means--> C | | A is able to buy C a drink. || A -means--> C | ||
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
|A sends a token to B. || A -agLET--> B | |A sends a token to B. || A -agLET--> B | ||
|- | |- | ||
|A buys a drink for C. || A -*pint*-> C | |A buys a drink for C. || A --*pint*---> C | ||
|- | |- | ||
|B gives token to C. || B -agLET--> C | |B gives token to C. || B -agLET--> C | ||
|- | |- | ||
|C buys a drink for B. || C -*pint*-> B | |C buys a drink for B. || C --*pint*---> B | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Through process then, || A -*pint*-> B | |Through process then, || A --*pint*---> B | ||
|- | |- | ||
| || A -agLET--> C | | || A -agLET--> C | ||
| Happiness abounds. | |- | ||
| || Happiness abounds. | |||
|} | |} | ||
Latest revision as of 02:12, 21 May 2008
_alt.gothic Alcohol Transfer Engine [agATE]_ RFC[edit]
As devised by erith, Scientific Factologist, and Specifistician[edit]
Description[edit]
agATE is a simple process. Let us suppose that Alice and Bob have a shared secret. No, wait. Erm. goth(a)<ref>e.g. Absinthe Fabricat Cardiac</ref> wishes to buy goth(b)<ref>e.g. Bier Of Sorrows</ref> a drink. goth(a) and goth(b) are unlikely to be at the same event in the near future, but both know goth(c)<ref> e.g. Charlotte Octal </ref><ref> Look, i'm doing my best here. it is about process, not names.</ref> will be seeing goth(a) and then goth(b) soon.
So, goth(a) acquires a stone<ref>No, really - some kind of rock or a marble or something, a physical token. an agLET ( alt.gothic Libatory Encounter Token) is an acceptable substitute. I might even make some for distribution...</ref>, buys goth(c) a drink, and sends goth(b) the stone. When goth(b) sees goth(c) they give goth(c) the stone, and goth(c) buys goth(b) a drink. For validation purposes, goth(a) has supplied goth(c) with a picture of the stone, if not a counterpart.<ref>agLET's may, for example, be a key and a lock. this is not just about working, but about being exclusionary and elitist. think of these as our very own round TUITs.</ref> goth(a) has, for all intents and purposes, purchased a drink for goth(b), and goth(c) not only has a story from it, but a token of their participation in the transaction.
Process[edit]
To recap -
A wishes to buy B a drink. | A --intent--> B |
A is able to buy C a drink. | A -means--> C |
C is (or will be) able to buy B a drink. | C -means--> B |
A sends a token to B. | A -agLET--> B |
A buys a drink for C. | A --*pint*---> C |
B gives token to C. | B -agLET--> C |
C buys a drink for B. | C --*pint*---> B |
Through process then, | A --*pint*---> B |
A -agLET--> C | |
Happiness abounds. |
agLET Conceptualization[edit]
Frequent travellers within the gothic subculture may find themselves laden with agLETs. Ensuring that they have a means to be transported, personalising them, or otherwise ensuring that goth(C) has an interest in displaying said token/agLET just makes the scheme better.
A draft agLET speculation follows:
an agLET (alt.gothic Libatory Encounter Token) should be:
- unique
- such that it can be sent in a standard airmail envelope
- recognisable from a digital photograph/description/similar
the following qualities of an agLET are preferred:
- made out of rock
- capable of being attached to a cord, keychain, or lanyard
- shiny
improvements to the agLET specification may include:
- recyclability
- inherent addressability (as with Gothic Internal Mail Protocol)
- sustainability
- jangly
Footnotes[edit]
<references />